Proteinase-activated receptor 4 (PAR4): activation and inhibition of rat platelet aggregation by PAR4-derived peptides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the actions of receptor-activating peptide analogues (PAR4APs), modeled on the proteolytically-revealed tethered ligand sequence of murine proteinase-activated receptor-4 (PAR4), in a rat platelet aggregation assay. The PAR4APs GYPGKF-NH2 (GY-NH2) and AYPGKF-NH2 (AY-NH2) were able to cause aggregation with EC50 values of about 40 microM and 15 microM, respectively. The reverse human PAR4 sequence (VQGPYG-NH2, YG-NH2) and the PAR1AP SFLLR-NH2, did not cause aggregation. In contrast, trans-cinnamoyl-YPGKF-NH2 (tcY-NH2) did not cause aggregation but blocked aggregation caused by GY-NH2, AY-NH2, and thrombin without affecting ADP-mediated aggregation. We conclude that in contrast to the PAR1AP, the PAR4APs GY-NH2 and AY-NH2 activate rat platelets via a PAR4-related receptor and that peptide analogues modeled on the PAR4 tethered activating sequence can serve as useful agonist and antagonist probes for assessing the consequence of activating PAR4 either by PAR4APs or thrombin in rat tissue preparations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".