MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024916734 · doi:10.1109/sis.2014.7011800

A biogeography-based optimization algorithm for energy efficient virtual machine placement

2014· article· en· W2024916734 on OpenAlexaff
Hafiz Munsub Ali, Daniel C. Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtual machineEnergy consumptionHeuristicServerGenetic algorithmEvolutionary algorithmVirtualizationMathematical optimizationDistributed computingCloud computingArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEngineeringComputer networkOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, high levels of energy consumption in datacenters has become a concern not only due to operational costs, but also due to adverse effects on the environment (i.e., carbon emission, climate change, etc.) Virtualization technology can provide better management of physical servers/machines (PM) and may help reduce power consumption. The purpose of this study is to minimize the total energy consumption through good virtual machine (VM) placement. The VM placement problem has a large search space. Finding an optimal solution of such problems using an exhaustive search is impractical. Heuristic algorithms can provide high-quality solutions with limited computing resources in acceptable time. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) can be considered as heuristic tools that can provide high-quality solutions to this type of problems. We propose a Biogeography Based Optimization (BBO) Algorithm for energy-efficient VM placement. We compare the BBO results with the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Overall, simulation results show that BBO outperforms GA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207