MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024917207 · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e31829c739a

How Often Does Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures Lead to Hip Arthroplasty?

2013· article· en· W2024917207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert V. O’Toole, Emily Hui, Amit Chandra, Jason W. Nascone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal fixationReduction (mathematics)ArthroplastyTotal hip arthroplastySurgeryHip arthroplastyAcetabulum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures in geriatric patients result in a low rate of conversion to hip arthroplasty and satisfactory hip-specific validated outcome scores at medium-term follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients who were 60 years or older who had acetabular fractures were treated at our center from 2001 through 2006. During this time period, fractures meeting operative criteria were treated with ORIF unless medical conditions warranted nonoperative treatment. Twenty-nine patients were lost to follow-up, 46 were deceased, and 11 declined to participate, leaving 61 potential patients for inclusion, 46 of whom were treated with ORIF (average follow-up, 4.4 years; range, 1.1-8.0 years). INTERVENTION: Standardized telephone interviews included hip-specific questions and validated outcome measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of conversion to hip arthroplasty and hip-specific validated outcome scores. RESULTS: Among 46 patients treated with ORIF (15 others were treated nonoperatively or with percutaneous screw fixation), 28% underwent hip arthroplasty an average 2.5 years after injury (range, 0.4-5.5 years) and had an average Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis score of 17 (range, 0-56; n = 38). This score is similar to or better than the typical scores after elective arthroplasty for arthritis and much better than the scores for patients with established arthritis (P < 0.05). The average SF-8 Health Survey physical component score was 46.1 (range, 31-62), similar to US population norms for the geriatric age group (P > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Few data exist regarding the treatment outcomes for geriatric acetabular fractures. It is difficult for clinicians to decide among ORIF, percutaneous fixation, acute arthroplasty, and nonoperative treatment. Our protocol of mostly ORIF showed a high 1-year mortality rate of 25% and a rate of conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF of 28%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic TraumaSame topicPelvic and Acetabular InjuriesFrench-language works237,207