MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024935685 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206576

Shared Kernel Information Embedding for discriminative inference

2009· article· en· W2024935685 on OpenAlexaff
Leonid Sigal, Roland Memisevic, David J. Fleet

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminative modelLatent variableInferenceEmbeddingKernel (algebra)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMultiple kernel learningPattern recognition (psychology)Latent variable modelKernel methodData miningMathematicsSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latent variable models (LVM), like the shared-GPLVM and the spectral latent variable model, help mitigate over-fitting when learning discriminative methods from small or moderately sized training sets. Nevertheless, existing methods suffer from several problems: (1) complexity; (2) the lack of explicit mappings to and from the latent space; (3) an inability to cope with multi-modality; and (4) the lack of a well-defined density over the latent space. We propose a LVM called the shared kernel information embedding (sKIE). It defines a coherent density over a latent space and multiple input/output spaces (e.g., image features and poses), and it is easy to condition on a latent state, or on combinations of the input/output states. Learning is quadratic, and it works well on small datasets. With datasets too large to learn a coherent global model, one can use sKIE to learn local online models. sKIE permits missing data during inference, and partially labelled data during learning. We use sKIE for human pose inference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern RecognitionSame topicGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceFrench-language works237,207