MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024956760 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2010.5421804

Thermal Management of Biosensor Networks

2010· article· en· W2024956760 on OpenAlexaff
Yahya Osais, F. Richard Yu, Marc St‐Hilaire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosensorObstacleMarkov decision processComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Wireless sensor networkMarkov processMathematical optimizationDistributed computingMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biosensors are a very promising technology that will take healthcare to the next level. However, there are obstacles that must be overcome before the full potential of this technology can be realized. One such obstacle is that the heat generated by implanted biosensors may damage the tissues around them. Dynamic sensor scheduling is one way to manage the heat generated by implanted biosensors. In this paper, the dynamic sensor scheduling problem is formulated as a Markov decision process. Not like previous works, the temperature increase in the tissues caused by heat is incorporated into the model. The solution of the model gives an optimal policy that when executed, it will result in the maximum possible network lifetime under a constraint on the maximum temperature tolerable by the patient's body. The optimal policy is compared with two policies one of which is specifically designed for biosensor networks. Numerical and simulation results show the validity of the model and superiority of the optimal policy produced by the model in terms of both network lifetime and temperature increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207