MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025029955 · doi:10.1117/12.842583

High-power fiber amplifier using a PM Yb-doped photodarkening-resistant LMA fiber with depressed-clad index profile design

2010· article· en· W2025029955 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Drolet, Claude Paré, Huimin Zheng, Pierre Laperle, Antoine Proulx, Yves Taillon

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhotodarkeningOpticsDispersion-shifted fiberYtterbiumFiber laserExtinction ratioFiberOptoelectronicsGraded-index fiberPolarization-maintaining optical fiberInsertion lossDopingFiber optic sensorComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on a depressed-clad index profile design, a PM Yb-doped large mode area (LMA) fiber with an effective mode area of 450 μm2 was designed and fabricated. The fiber was used to amplify 10-ns pulses at 1064 nm with a repetition rate of 100 kHz, and an output energy higher than 200 μJ was obtained, within a bandwidth of 0.5 nm. The fiber was coiled on a 12-cm diameter mandrel to obtain a single-mode output having a measured M2 value of 1.04. The output polarization extinction ratio was higher than 20 dB. The photodarkening excess loss of the Ytterbium//Phosphorus Aluminum co-doped fiber was measured to be a factor 5 lower than that of a reference Ytterbium/Aluminum co-doped fiber. It is shown how a depressed-clad index profile design can improve higher-order mode filtering while keeping the coiling diameter practical for compact fiber amplifier packaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207