MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025032956 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2010.5534598

Optical communications [Series Editorial]

2010· article· en· W2025032956 on OpenAlexaff
Osman S. Gebizlioglu, Hideo Kuwahara, V.K. Jain, John Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunicationsIPTVComputer scienceTelecommunications serviceThe InternetEnablingMobile telephonyService providerBroadband Integrated Services Digital NetworkBroadband10G-PONService (business)Broadband networksBusinessWavelength-division multiplexingOptical performance monitoringMobile radioWorld Wide WebMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this month's Optical Communications Series (OCS) we have selected contributions addressing developments in optical transport networks. Despite the slow recovery in the global economy, the global demand for Internet, video, TV, and telecommunications services has been growing at a brisk pace. As evidenced by product/service announcements at major industry conferences and trade shows, global demand for communications services with high-speed transmission of IPTV, peer-to-peer video exchange, and rapidly expanding mobile traffic shifting from former 2G to 3G to 4G services has been presenting many exciting business opportunities to the global providers of optical communications services and their suppliers. As telecommunications networks develop on a global scale, it has been realized that optical communications will continue to be the sole greatest enabler of the truly broadband communications-based services in such applications as long-distance education and telemedicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207