The Influence of Caffeine on Voluntary Muscle Activation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caffeine is a very common CNS stimulant that has been of interest to physiologists because of its direct effects on skeletal muscle in vitro, as well as ergogenic effects on laboratory tests of human performance. While in vitro studies have clearly demonstrated the effects of the drug on the CNS, the effects of caffeine on the voluntary activation of muscle in humans are less defined. Voluntary as well as involuntary supraspinal input, alpha motor neuron membrane properties, and afferent feedback to spinal and supraspinal neurons all modulate voluntary muscle activation, and caffeine may therefore alter muscle activation at several sites along the motor pathway. This review explores the effects of caffeine on voluntary muscle activation that have been demonstrated in recent human studies and discusses the central mechanisms that may enhance activation. Evidence of caffeine's effects on the motor evoked potential, Hoffman reflex, self-sustained firing of the alpha motor neuron, and pain and force sensation are presented as well as limitations and considerations of using the drug in human neuromuscular studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it