MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025047888 · doi:10.1080/10426500490426683

CATALYTIC DEHYDROCOUPLING OF AMINE-BORANE ADDUCTS TO FORM AMINOBORANES AND BORAZINES

2004· article· en· W2025047888 on OpenAlexaff
Cory A. Jaska, Karen Temple, Alan J. Lough, Ian Manners

Bibliographic record

VenuePhosphorus, sulfur, and silicon and the related elements · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorazineCatalysisChemistryBoraneAdductAmine gas treatingMedicinal chemistryMonomerHydroaminationPolymer chemistryNanoclustersOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mild, catalytic dehydrocoupling route to aminoboranes and borazine derivatives from either primary or secondary amine-borane adducts has been developed using late transition metal complexes as precatalysts. The dehydrocoupling of Me 2 NH·BH 3 was found to be catalyzed by 0.5 mol% [Rh(1,5-cod)(μ-Cl)] 2 in solution at 25°C to give [Me 2 N─BH 2 ] 2 (1) quantitatively after ca. 8 h. This new catalytic method was extended to other secondary adducts RR ′NH·BH 3 which afforded the dimeric [(1,4-C 4 H 8 )N─BH 2 ] 2 (2) and [PhCH 2 (Me)N─BH 2 ] 2 (3) or the monomeric aminoborane i Pr 2 N═BH 2 (4) under mild conditions. The catalytic dehydrocoupling of NH 3 ·BH 3 , MeNH 2 ·BH 3 , and PhNH 2 ·BH 3 at 45°C affords the borazine derivatives [RN─BH] 3 (5: R = H; 6: R = Me; 7:R = Ph). TEM analysis of the contents of the reaction solution for the [Rh(1,5-cod)(μ-Cl)] 2 catalyzed dehydrocoupling of Me 2 NH·BH 3 together with Hg poisoning experiments suggested a soluble heterogeneous catalyst involving Rh(0) nanoclusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhosphorus, sulfur, and silicon and the related elementsSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207