Neoarchean decoupling of upper- and mid-crustal tectonothermal domains in the southeast Slave Province: evidence from the Walmsley Lake area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Walmsley Lake area of the southeastern Slave Province, Northwest Territories, exposes a crustal transect from greenschist through to upper amphibolite facies. Two tectonothermal crustal domains are proposed based on disparate tectonic histories and rock types. Within the upper tectonothermal domain, D1 deformation reached lower amphibolite facies prior to 2614 Ma and associated M1 metamorphic conditions outlasted D1. Peak M2 conditions reached middle amphibolite facies prior to 2603 Ma and outlasted D2 deformation. Deformation style and metamorphic sequencing during these two pre-2600 Ma events are consistent with regional crustal shortening and thickening in the upper tectonothermal domain. At mid-crustal levels in the lower tectonothermal domain, a third tectonothermal event (D3M3) produced uppermost amphibolite-facies peak metamorphic conditions, transposed preexisting fabrics to shallow dips, and produced a subhorizontal foliation and recumbent folds at ca. 2583 Ma. D3 structures are not present in the upper tectono thermal domain, however, evidence of M3 heating is locally displayed in rocks at the base of the upper tectonothermal domain. Upper and lower domains were structurally decoupled during the D3M3 event. In rare places where the zone between the two domains outcrops, it comprises a narrow high-strain zone. The metamorphic and structural topology of the Walmsley Lake area is consistent with the topology predicted from thermomechanical modeling and modern observations of gravitational accommodation in structurally thickened crust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".