Polyphasic taxonomy of the basidiomycetous yeast genus<i>Rhodosporidium</i>:<i>R. azoricum</i>sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report presents the description of a new heterothallic Rhodosporidium species, R. azoricum sp. nov. The new species is based on two strains previously identified as Rhodotorula glutinis, which were isolated from soil in São Miguel island, Azores, Portugal. Evidence that the two strains were conspecific and distinct from Rhodotorula glutinis was obtained in DNA fingerprinting experiments using the microsatellite-primed PCR approach (MSP-PCR) and the primers M13 and (GTG)5. In order to determine the phylogenetic position of the new species, the nucleotide sequence of the D1/D2 region of the 26S rDNA was analysed and Rhodosporidium azoricum was found to belong to a cluster including R. fluviale, R. lusitaniae, Sporidiobolus microsporus, and S. ruineniae. The life cycle of R. azoricum was investigated and comparisons integrating physiological, morphological, and molecular data were made with related species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".