Propofol enhances ischemic tolerance of middle-aged rat hearts: effects on 15-F2t-isoprostane formation and tissue antioxidant capacity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Experimental study has shown that myocardial ischemic tolerance is reduced during middle-age. We investigated the effect of propofol on ischemic tolerance of middle-aged rat hearts. METHODS: Hearts of young adult (10 weeks old, Y) and middle-aged rats (20 weeks old, M) were assigned to propofol (P-Y, P-M) and control (C-Y, C-M) groups (n=6 each). Hearts were perfused using a Langendorff preparation with Krebs-Henseleit solution (KH) at constant flow rates. We applied propofol (P-Y, P-M) for 10 min at 12 microg/ml before inducing 40 min global ischemia. During ischemia, saline (C-Y, C-M) or propofol (P-Y, P-M) in saline was perfused through the aorta at 60 microl/min. Propofol in KH was perfused at 12 microg/ml for the first 15 min of reperfusion and subsequently reduced to 5 microg/ml in propofol treatment groups. Coronary effluent was assayed for 15-F(2t)-isoprostane after equilibration, during ischemia (T(1)) and at 0.5 (T(2)) and 5 (T(3)) min of reperfusion. After 90 min of reperfusion (T(4)), hearts were harvested to assess tissue antioxidant capacity. RESULTS: In P-Y, we observed an increased latency to ischemic-contracture and a significantly reduced contracture after 35 min ischemia compared to control groups. No ischemic contracture was observed in P-M. There were significantly lower 15-F(2t)-isoprostane levels in P-M and P-Y than in C-M and C-Y at T(1). At T(4), the recovery of left ventricular developed pressure in P-M was greater than in P-Y (P<0.05); both were greater than in C-M and C-Y. CONCLUSION: Propofol enhanced ischemic tolerance of middle-aged hearts, primarily by inhibiting lipid peroxidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it