MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025133193 · doi:10.1109/tec.2003.822296

Identification of Physical Parameters of a Synchronous Generator From Online Measurements

2004· article· en· W2025133193 on OpenAlexaff
M. Karrari, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemPermanent magnet synchronous generatorTransfer functionVoltageMultivariable calculusGenerator (circuit theory)Synchronous motorElectric generatorEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Control engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method to determine physical parameters of a synchronous generator based on an online measurement of the electrical power, terminal voltage, and field voltage, following a small perturbation of the field voltage, and the rotor angle at the same steady-state operating condition is described in this paper. A multivariable linear transfer function, identified using the sampled input-output data, is converted to the parameters of the Heffron-Phillips model. Using the relations of the Heffron-Phillips parameters with the physical parameters, the physical parameters are estimated. These estimated parameters are then used in a nonlinear structure to model the synchronous generator. Experimental results with the proposed method applied to a micromachine show good accuracy of the model and also show that the identified nonlinear model is valid at other operating conditions. At dramatically different operating conditions, however, to include the effects of unstructured nonlinearities such as magnetic saturation, the parameters of the nonlinear structure can be slightly adjusted for better performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207