Heterolytic Cleavage of Disulfides by Frustrated Lewis Pairs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The addition of diphenyl disulfide (PhSSPh) to tBu(2)P(C(6)F(4))B(C(6)F(5))(2) (1) affords the zwitterionic phosphonium borate [tBu(2)P(SPh)(C(6)F(4))B(SPh)(C(6)F(5))(2)] (2), while the addition of a base or donor solvent to 2 effected the liberation of disulfide and the formation of [tBu(2)P(C(6)F(4))B(donor)(C(6)F(5))(2)]. The reaction of 1 with S(8) gave tBu(2)P(S)(C(6)F(4))B(C(6)F(5))(2) (3). In a similar fashion, the frustrated Lewis pair of tBu(3)P/B(C(6)F(5))(3) reacts with RSSR to give [tBu(3)P(SR)][(RS)B(C(6)F(5))(3)] (R = Ph (4), p-tolyl (5), iPr (6)). In contrast, the corresponding reaction of BnSSBn yields a 1:1:1 mixture of tBu(3)P horizontal lineS, Bn(2)S, and B(C(6)F(5))(3). Species 4 reacts with p-tolylSSp-tolyl to give a mixture of 4, 5, PhSSPh, and p-tolylSS p-tolyl, while treatment of 5 with PhSSPh afforded a similar mixture. To probe this, a crossover experiment between [tBu(3)P(SPh)][B(C(6)F(5))(4)] (7) and [NBu(4)][(p-tolylS)B(C(6)F(5))(3)] (9) was performed. The former species was prepared by a reaction of 4 with [Ph(3)C][B(C(6)F(5)) (4)], while cation exchange of [(Et(2)O)(2)Li( p-tolylS)B(C(6)F(5))(3)] (8) with [NBu(4)]Br gave 9. The reaction of compounds 7 and 9 gave a statistical mixture of the cations [tBu(3)P(SR)](+) and anions [(RS)B(C(6)F(5))(3)](-), R = Ph, Sp-tolyl. The mechanism of this exchange process was probed and is proposed to be an equilibrium involving disulfide and the frustrated Lewis pair. Crystallographic data are reported for compounds 4-8, and the natures of the P-S cations are examined via DFT calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".