MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2025217940 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0550

Give Your Other Vote to the Sister: A Woman’s Journey into the Great War (review)

2009· article· en· W2025217940 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Laurel Sefton MacDowell

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSisterBrotherAdventureTRIPS architectureNarrativeHistoryPseudonymGender studiesMedia studiesLawSociologyPolitical scienceArt historyLiteratureArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Give Your Other Vote to the Sister: A Woman’s Journey into the Great War Laurel Sefton MacDowell (bio) Debbie Marshall. Give Your Other Vote to the Sister: A Woman’s Journey into the Great War. University of Calgary Press. xxvi, 320. $29.95 This delightful study of Roberta MacAdams, the first of two women elected to the Alberta legislature in 1917, is a good read. As MacAdams left few papers, the author, Debbie Marshall, displays remarkable tenacity, imagination, and curiosity in tracking down her story. Her technique of interlacing her own research trips in search of the past and Roberta MacAdams’s life with the historical narrative works well and displays the trials and adventures of a persistent historical researcher. Born in 1880 in Sarnia, Ontario, to a middle-class family, Roberta MacAdams grew to be a refined and self-contained young woman, with a traditional view of gender roles in society that her experience in the Great War would change. After high school, as she did not marry at a young age, she attended the Macdonald Institute in Guelph, which grew out of Adelaide Hoodless’s efforts to promote domestic science. With this training and at her brother’s invitation, Roberta headed to Edmonton, where she taught rural women new skills and helped them establish women’s institutes, which she briefly oversaw as their first superintendent. In 1912 she worked as the supervisor of household science for Edmonton’s public schools, where she administered a large staff and handled budgets. But it was her work in the war that made MacAdams a public figure and formed her ideas. In 1916, she was appointed dietitian of the Ontario Government Military Hospital, built in Orpington, Kent. There she budgeted and planned menus and supervised the preparation of about 3,500 meals a day for patients arriving from the front. Marshall is a talented writer and very good at evoking the atmosphere and issues that were important to men and women living through the [End Page 364] Great War with bits of detail or well-situated excerpts from letters. The role of women in the war was important, and the nursing sisters, ambulance drivers, and other women like Roberta gave care and comfort to the soldiers. In 1916 the Alberta legislature gave women the right to vote. In preparation for the 1917 provincial election, the government passed legislation that gave soldiers and nurses their own constituency, with two members-at-large to represent them. In June 1917 Louise McKinney was the first woman in the British Empire to be elected to office. The overseas vote was in September. The urgent pressure from Beatrice Nasmyth, a Canadian feminist working in London, persuaded Roberta that she had a duty to the soldiers and to the women making sacrifices for the war back home and that she should run for one of the two overseas legislature seats. Her campaign leaflet with its handsome portrait and slogan, ‘Give one vote to the man of your choice and the other to the sister,’ did the trick. MacAdams beat twenty male candidates and won the seat. She served for one term, during which she toured the front lines with several female journalists, chaperoned war brides coming to Canada, made speeches in the legislature and to many groups about the sacrifices the warriors were making, and stressed the need for a program of reconstruction at the war’s end to help the survivors readjust to civilian life. She also focused her legislative interests on social welfare measures, which included more teacher training, better hospitals, and measures to rebuild society. ‘The once-hesitant feminist’ at the end of the war ‘encouraged women to use their new political muscle to bring about social change.’ For a time she directed the home branch of the Soldier Settlement Board in Alberta helping soldiers’ wives to adjust to new lives in rural Alberta. The book ends happily. Although Roberta did not run for re-election, she did marry, had one son, and she and her husband settled on a farm in the Peace River country. Having worked comfortably mostly with men all her life in interesting jobs, she decided to ‘walk...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→