MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025223531 · doi:10.2118/162777-ms

What Don’t We Know About Self Sourced Oil Reservoirs: Challenges and Potential Solutions

2012· article· en· W2025223531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSource rockGeologyOil shaleTight oilPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilShale oilPetroleumPetroleum reservoirScale (ratio)GeochemistryEarth sciencePaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While light tight oil reservoirs such as found in Bakken and Cardium style plays can be stimulated by fracturing, significant oil production from true shale reservoirs dominated by clay size fraction sediments may not be feasible, even when reservoirs are fractured, if current oil storage models in source rocks are valid. We look at the source rock knowledgebase and the gaps in our understanding relevant to assessing oil production from shale sections. Despite over four decades of study of petroleum source rocks by geochemists, our mechanistic understanding of them remains at best qualitative and inadequate for quantitative reservoir characterisation purposes. Past studies emphasised molecular chemistry details and gross mass balance studies at large scale, but only few detailed mechanistic studies of actual physical process and transport function during generation and primary migration are available. Empiricism and generality dominate current concepts and most R&D peaked in the 1980s when Oil Company R&D spending was at its highest, but declined after that. Today there are many areas of uncertainty, but reassuringly, research is starting again and crucially, abundant core samples, which were largely absent before, are now also available. There has also been a revolution in the understanding of shale sedimentology which forces us to reexamine many of our earlier precepts about source rock formation and suggests that in the absence of naturally fractured silica or carbonate intervals within source rocks, such as found in the Monterey Fm., very small scale collateral silt and sand horizons may be locally important small scale reservoirs in typical shales. The bulk of the oil storage in source rocks however is in kerogen, where dominantly diffusive rather than Darcy flow processes operate and where fracturing may have little impact on productivity. We look at the technical barriers, both theoretical and analytical, to understanding true shale dominated reservoir oil production potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it