MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025223531 · doi:10.2118/162777-ms

What Don’t We Know About Self Sourced Oil Reservoirs: Challenges and Potential Solutions

2012· article· en· W2025223531 on OpenAlexaff
Steve Larter, Haiping Huang, Barry Bennett, L R Snowdon

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSource rockGeologyOil shaleTight oilPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilShale oilPetroleumPetroleum reservoirScale (ratio)GeochemistryEarth sciencePaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While light tight oil reservoirs such as found in Bakken and Cardium style plays can be stimulated by fracturing, significant oil production from true shale reservoirs dominated by clay size fraction sediments may not be feasible, even when reservoirs are fractured, if current oil storage models in source rocks are valid. We look at the source rock knowledgebase and the gaps in our understanding relevant to assessing oil production from shale sections. Despite over four decades of study of petroleum source rocks by geochemists, our mechanistic understanding of them remains at best qualitative and inadequate for quantitative reservoir characterisation purposes. Past studies emphasised molecular chemistry details and gross mass balance studies at large scale, but only few detailed mechanistic studies of actual physical process and transport function during generation and primary migration are available. Empiricism and generality dominate current concepts and most R&D peaked in the 1980s when Oil Company R&D spending was at its highest, but declined after that. Today there are many areas of uncertainty, but reassuringly, research is starting again and crucially, abundant core samples, which were largely absent before, are now also available. There has also been a revolution in the understanding of shale sedimentology which forces us to reexamine many of our earlier precepts about source rock formation and suggests that in the absence of naturally fractured silica or carbonate intervals within source rocks, such as found in the Monterey Fm., very small scale collateral silt and sand horizons may be locally important small scale reservoirs in typical shales. The bulk of the oil storage in source rocks however is in kerogen, where dominantly diffusive rather than Darcy flow processes operate and where fracturing may have little impact on productivity. We look at the technical barriers, both theoretical and analytical, to understanding true shale dominated reservoir oil production potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.035
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources ConferenceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207