Ein klassisches Haus in Delos ? Zur Chronologie der Maison O in der Insula III des Quartier du théâtre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses the recent hypothesis, according to which a type of house hitherto believed to belong to the Hellenistic period on Delos could go back to the Classical period (5th c. BC): a simple elongated house, organised around a court, into which a typical group of two or three rooms (oecus major and annexe[s]) opens at the back, and a vestibule and service rooms in the front. A reexamination is proposed of House Ο in Insula III of the Theatre Quarter, which serves as a proof of this hypothesis. Based on the visible walls, four phases can be distinguished: it was only in the second phase that the house under consideration here was constructed, integrating preexisting walls of the Classical period (first phase) ; it was part of the first "urbanising programme" attested in the quarter and cannot antedate the construction of the theatre in the 3rd century BC. After a transformation with embellishments (third phase), in the course of which were added latrines, additional rooms and a colonnade, an oil-press was installed in the house at the beginning of the lst century BC (fourth phase).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".