MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025236015 · doi:10.1002/stab.201290082

Shuter Street Bridge, Toronto – Fußgängerbrücke mit gebogenen Isoliergläsern

2012· article· de· W2025236015 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStahlbau · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eine über 30 Meter lange gläserne Fußgängerbrücke mit einer Tragstruktur aus gebogenen Stahlrohren erstreckt sich über die Shuter Street im kanadischen Toronto. Ovale Stahlringe sind jeweils verdreht zueinander angeordnet und mit gebogenen Isoliergläsern verglast. Mit der neuen Brücke hat das Architekturbüro Diamond and Schmitt Architects Inc. aus Toronto eine witterungsunabhängige Verbindung zwischen dem St. Michael´s Hospital und dem neuen Forschungszentrum Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute geschaffen. Die optisch ansprechende Fußgängerbrücke hat eine Höhe von 4,60m und eine Breite von 3,80m. Da in Toronto das unterirdische Fußgängerwegesystem PATH vorrangig genutzt wird, konnte die Stadt nur durch die architektonische Originalität der Brücke zur Genehmigung bewegt werden. Gebogene, thermisch vorgespannte Isolierglasscheiben geben der Tragstruktur aus sich kreuzenden gebogenen Rohren seine Leichtigkeit und bieten aus jeder Ansicht heraus ein anderes Erscheinungsbild.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it