Exon-skipping in BCR/ABL is induced by ABL exon 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The BCR/ABL fusion gene is pathognomonic for chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML). We have previously reported alternative splicing of BCR/ABL, as indicated by the detection of both p190- and p210-encoding transcripts, in about 60% of CML patient samples. These exon-skipping events involved the joining of ABL exon 2 to variable upstream BCR exons. Similarly, ABL exon 2 is alternatively spliced to either of two upstream ABL exons (1a or 1b) in c-ABL. We have constructed BCR and BCR/ABL minigenes to study this phenomenon in more detail. These constructs were transfected into various cell types and splicing was assessed by reverse transcriptase PCR. Whereas the basic BCR minigene expressed exon-inclusive transcripts only, insertion of genomic DNA spanning ABL exon 2 induced exon-skipping but only when expressed in the CML cell lines K562 and EM3. In this study we localized the required sequence element to ABL exon 2 itself. These results mimic the splicing phenotype displayed by most CML patients. We propose a model where a trans-factor present in some CML cells interacts with ABL exon 2 pre-mRNA to promote skipping of upstream BCR exons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".