MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025247940 · doi:10.4043/24305-ms

Cellular Tendon - Enabling Technology for Ultra-Deep Water TLPs

2013· article· en· W2025247940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Brasil · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep waterRobustness (evolution)EngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPetroleum engineeringMarine engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cellular tendon concept described in this paper is an enabling technology proposed for Tension Leg Platforms (TLP) to meet the industry's demands for producing oil and gas in ultra-deep waters beyond 1500 m. The technical merits of the concept for ultra-deepwater field development have been demonstrated in this paper using TLPs with representative large, medium or small payloads in water depths between 1,500 and 3,000 meters. The technical readiness is enhanced by using mature industry products for tendon components, and by adapting existing industry practices to construct and install the Cellular Tendons. The Cellular Tendon has advantages over conventional tendons in technical robustness and economics of the project, as well as enabling/enhancing local fabrication content. The intellectual property of this design concept is protected under a pending global patent. Background Historically, TLPs are ideal platforms for deep water drilling and oil and gas production with dry trees worldwide. Currently there are over a dozen TLPs installed in regions including the GOM, Southeast Asia, and West Africa. Several TLPs are planned for installation in the GOM, North Sea and Brazil in the near future. The application of TLPs with a conventional tendon system has reached technical and economical limit for water depths beyond 1,500 meters. For a TLP in ultra-deep water, the technical and commercial practicality is constrained by the feasibility of the tendon main body and it meeting stiffness and collapse requirements. Also, the cost of conventional tendon installation in certain regions is sometimes prohibitive for the commercial viability of the project. Design of the Cellular Tendon System The Cellular Tendon concept has the same main components as a conventional tendon. A conventional tendon consists of three major parts: a tendon top segment (TTS) interfaces with the platform, a tendon bottom segment (TBS) connects to the tendon foundation at the seafloor, and a main body that links the two through the water column. The Cellular Tendon innovation resides in the design of the main body. Instead of one pipe, it consists of multiple metallic tubules. It also has an upper transition unit to interface with the TTS and a bottom transition unit to interface with the TBS. The top and bottom interfaces—TTS and TBS--are kept the same as in conventional tendons. The same tension-monitoring units in the conventional tendons can be used in the Cellular Tendons as well. Figure 1 is the elevation view of the TLP moored to seabed by the tendons. The tendons are connected to the tendon porch through the top interface and the foundation through the bottom interface. Figure 2 is the schematic of the Cellular Tendon system. Unlike the single carbon steel pipe used as the main body in a convention tendon design, the main body consists of multiple metallic tubular strings. Each individual string is composed of pipes butt welded at their ends. All the strings are arranged in parallel and assembled on-shore. The pipe material can be carbon steel or aluminum. Conventional carbon steel pipes have been used in many existing TLP tendons are considered mature industry practice and are preferred to be used first in the field development. The number of strings in the main body is designed to meet the stiffness requirements, strength requirements, fatigue requirements, and to be practical for fabrication and installation. The outer diameter and/or wall thickness of the pipes can vary along the string. In general, the OD of the pipes is smaller and /or the pipe wall thickness is increased for those segments at greater water depths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it