MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025256526 · doi:10.1159/000242749

Vitamin D Metabolism in Preterm Infants

2009· review· en· W2025256526 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Salle, J. Senterre, F. H. Glorieux, E. Delvin, G Putet

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolismMedicinePhysiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perinatal metabolism of vitamin D was studied in premature babies with the aim of: (1) reporting the relationship between the pregnant mother and her preterm infant and the metabolism of vitamin D during the first weeks of life, and (2) assessing the effect of vitamin D metabolites on phosphorus calcium and magnesium intestinal absorption. There was only a positive correlation between plasma cord calcium and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the mother's plasma levels at birth. During the hypocalcemic episode observed during the first week of life, vitamin D activation did occur, but later on rickets or osteomalacia cannot be due to the low levels of vitamin D metabolites in the preterm receiving an adequate dose of vitamin D (1,000-1,200 IU of D2). Calcitriol, the major metabolite of vitamin D, is acting on the intestine and promotes calcium absorption even in very tiny prematures. The pathogenesis of hypomineralization in the preterm infant is due to the low intake of calcium or phosphorus and/or poor absorption of calcium in the case of vitamin D deficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207