MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025259231 · doi:10.1109/epec.2013.6802926

Prediction of PV power quality: Total harmonic distortion of current

2013· article· en· W2025259231 on OpenAlexaff
James Rodway, Petr Musı́lek, Stanislav Mišák, Lukáš Prokop

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal harmonic distortionPhotovoltaic systemDistortion (music)Renewable energyPower qualityPower (physics)HarmonicsQuality (philosophy)Computer scienceCurrent (fluid)HarmonicIrradianceGridElectronic engineeringElectric power qualityElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsAcousticsOpticsVoltageBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing amount of renewable energy sources being connected to the grid, issues concerning the power quality are becoming increasingly important. This is due to the distributed nature of these power sources and to their higher variability when compared to more traditional sources. For photovoltaic sources, total harmonic distortion of current is one of the main power quality parameter closely related to solar irradiance. This work explores this relationship and employs computational intelligence techniques in order to predict current distortion values. Preliminary results confirm the possibility to capture these relationships and predict occurrence of power quality issues ahead of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207