New epiphytic araphid diatoms in the genus <i>Ulnaria</i> (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Titicaca, Bolivia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two new epiphytic species of Ulnaria (Kützing) Compère, U. titicacaensis E. Morales, Ector & P.B. Hamilton and U. macilenta E. Morales, C.E. Wetzel & S.F. Rivera, are described from the Tiquina Strait, Lake Titicaca, Bolivia. The taxa have distinctive morphological features and their separation from morphologically related taxa and from each other is predominantly based on features of the valve central area and type of colonies. Whereas most morphologically similar taxa have a clear unilateral central area and form ribbon-like colonies, U. titicacaensis has a central area which is large and depressed internally, square to rectangular fascia, forms pin-cushion-like colonies mainly on Cladophora species, and has large polyphosphate bodies located toward the frustule apices. In contrast, U. macilenta has a similar central area to that in U. titicacaensis, but has narrower valves, forms short palisade groupings arranged in pin-cushion-like colonies, mainly on Oedogonium species and has polyphosphate bodies distributed throughout the frustule lumen. Morphological and ecological aspects of both new taxa are discussed in the light of available literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".