MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decomposition Rates and Taphonomic Changes Associated with the Estimation of Time Since Death in a Summer Climate: A Case Study from Urban Nova Scotia

2013· article· en· W2025292078 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Courtney L. Brown, Tanya R. Peckmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Society of Forensic Science Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de la Défense Nationale
KeywordsNova scotiaTaphonomyDecompositionTemperate climateEnvironmental scienceNova (rocket)GeographyEcologyPhysical geographyBiologyArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating time since death has an integral role in missing persons and found human remains cases; therefore, it is necessary to understand decomposition rates and taphonomic changes for the environment in which a body is found. Most research related to rates of human decomposition has been conducted in environments that do not reflect the temperate climate of Nova Scotia, Canada. The lower temperatures slow the decomposition processes and taphonomic changers, thus increasing the apparent postmortem interval. A pilot project was carried out in an urban Nova Scotia environment. It examined the decomposition rates of four domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) deposited on the ground surface and allowed to decompose naturally. Results from this study indicate that skeletonization begins between days 64 and 80 and that the rate of decomposition occurs logarithmically. The slower decomposition rates, present in this climate, indicate the necessity of regional data to assist in forensic investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Society of Forensic Science JournalSame topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207