MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on the Relationship Between City and District Average Price by GAOT in Taipei

2013· article· en· W2025295529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hui Chung Yeh, Tsu Kuang Hsieh, Tai Sheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnit priceUnit (ring theory)Real estateEconometricsQuarter (Canadian coin)Correlation coefficientEconomicsStatisticsAgricultural economicsBusinessMathematicsGeographyMicroeconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 2012, Taiwan enforces real price login, people can reference data and understand the changing price of various regions. The housing price of this study, therefore, is designated by unit price of trading contract. Taipei City, one of five municipalities in Taiwan, is found the unit price of trading contract is the most than others in an upward trend in its database from the third quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2012 (total twenty seasons). So, this study explores the relationship with others between unit price of trading contract overall in Taipei and unit price of trading contract of 12 districts. It is going to use autonomic architecture model with the ability of genetic algorithm operate tree (GAOT) to find out the best combination of variables and establish the relationship mode between each other. It also can assess overall real estate trends in Taipei City by important changing of districts. Research statistical analysis shows correlation coefficient (CC) for unit price of trading contract is 0.98 in Daan district and overall Taipei City. The result shows a high degree of correlation. After GAOT operator, besides, the establish assessment model could be found. It only uses unit price of trading contract of four districts. The unit price of trading contract of overall Taipei can be known. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) is up to 0.996 and root mean squared error (RMSE) is 0.406. The results are better than multiple linear regression (MLR) (R 2 =0.994, RMSE=0.490) and appear that GAOT can predict accurately of overall Taipei. It exist the relationship with each other between four districts and Taipei. In other words, the trend of variable is in coincide circumstance. The advantage of unit price of trading contract can be later used, therefore, this kind of mode to statistic four districts. The forecasting process for unit price of trading contract overall Taipei engages the government and civil society to assess overall real estate market of urban area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207