Confirmation of the occurrence of the chewing louse<i>Bovicola</i>(<i>Lepikentron</i>)<i>breviceps</i>(Insecta: Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae) on alpacas (<i>Lama pacos</i>) in New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extract Alpacas (Lama pacos) were first introduced into New Zealand from South America in 1878, but did not become established (Wodzicki Citation1950). Subsequently, some were brought in to be kept in zoological gardens. The first major shipment of alpacas and llamas (Lama glama) of about 1,200 animals, introduced into New Zealand to develop the production of a high-quality wool fibre, arrived from Chile in 1989 (Corrin and Burnett Citation1989). It was divided into two groups, one sent to Omarama, Central Otago, and the other to Flock House, Bulls, to check their ability to adapt to high- and low-land conditions, respectively. Shortly thereafter, the first major shipment of alpacas imported by private investors arrived on farms around Palmerston North (FI HillFootnote1, pers. comm.). In their native range in the mountains of Perú, Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, alpacas are parasitised by two species of host-specific lice: the blood-sucking louse Microthoracius mazzai Werneck, 1932 (Cicchino et al Citation1998) and the chewing (or biting) louse Bovicola (Lepikentron) breviceps Rudow, 1866. Besides alpacas, B. (L.) breviceps parasitises two other species of South American camelids, the llama and the guanaco (Lama guanicoe) (Price et al Citation2003). Notwithstanding quarantine regulations and procedures, which include treatments to remove internal and external parasites until animals are proven clear before release, lice of the species B. (L.) breviceps were evidently introduced into New Zealand with their alpaca hosts and now appear to have become established in at least some herds here. Suspicions of the occurrence of this louse species were first reported on a llama and an alpaca in the South Island of New Zealand (McKenna Citation2001, Citation2003). However, these latter records were based on the presence of eggs and nymphs only, thus preventing their specific identity from being established with any certainty. Here, we now provide confirmation of the presence of B. (L.) breviceps in New Zealand. This confirmation is based on the examination of a large number of nymphs and, more importantly, at least 10 adult female lice collected from a Huacayan alpaca on a property near Palmerston North on 28 October 2005. While there were other alpacas accompanying this particular animal that may have carried lice too, none showed symptoms of lousiness to the same extent and were not examined. Slide-mounted females of B. (L.) breviceps can be easily identified and distinguished from other species of Bovicola by the morphology of their ventral terminalia, in particular the shape of the gonapophyses (= gonopods) and the configuration of their pigmented sclerites (Lyal Citation1985). The identification of adult B. (L.) breviceps in conjunction with nymphs in the current case made it possible to confirm that this louse species was also present in the sample containing only nymphs reported by McKenna (Citation2003). However, we have no further specimens or information that would allow a positive identification of the species in the material from the llama reported by McKenna (Citation2001). Despite being called a ‘biting louse’, B. (L.) breviceps does not bite the host skin, but feeds by chewing on skin scurf; hence the name ‘chewing louse’ is more accurate. The presence of these lice may reduce the value of an alpaca fleece but, even in animals with heavy infestations, they do not appear to have detrimental effects on the quality of the fleece or represent a health risk for alpacas (Vaughan and Carmichael Citation1999). Eradication of B. (L.) breviceps may be a viable option in some instances but requires repeated treatments with a suitable insecticide and isolation until treated animals can be declared parasite-free (Vaughan Citation2004). Treatment with cypermethrin (Cypercare; Ancare New Zealand Ltd, Auckland, NZ) at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg was found to be effective in the louse-infested animal reported here. Although two treatments were made within a 14-day interval, the second was only a backup, there being no indication of live lice after the first treatment. Accordingly, we suspect that a single treatment may generally be adequate, especially if all animals from an infested herd are treated at the same time. Voucher specimens, representative of the two records of B. (L.) breviceps from alpacas in New Zealand, have been permanently slide-mounted in Canada Balsam and deposited in the entomological collection of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".