Systematic Study of the Synthesis of Macrocyclic Dipeptide β-Turn Mimics Possessing 8-, 9-, and 10- Membered Rings by Ring-Closing Metathesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[structures: see text] A systematic study was performed to establish general synthesis protocols for forming enantiomerically pure macrocyclic dipeptide lactams. Focusing on macrocycles of 8-, 9-, and 10-membered rings, effective syntheses were achieved by a sequence featuring peptide coupling of allyl- and homoallyl-glycine building blocks followed by ring-closing metathesis. The 8-membered lactam-possessing cis-amide and cis-olefin geometry as well as 9-membered [corrected] lactams having trans-amide and cis-olefin [corrected] configurations were effectively prepared by a general strategy employing the respective protected dipeptide, the first generation Grubbs' catalyst, and temporary protection of the central amide as a benzyl derivative. The 10-membered macrocycle was synthesized possessing cis- or trans-olefin geometry by employing similar metathesis conditions in the presence or absence of temporary benzyl amide protection, respectively [corrected]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".