The effect of adding exogenous phytase to nutrient-reduced corn- and wheat-based diets on performance and egg quality of two strains of laying hens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A laying trial was conducted in which ISA-Brown and ISA-White hens were fed diets based on corn or wheat that had been pelleted to eliminate endogenous phytase. Control diets were formulated to contain adequate levels of all nutrients. Nutrient-reduced diets were formulated to account for nutrients released by the phytase. To formulate these diets, phytase was entered into the matrix with a value, on a weight basis, of 1,173% for CP (60.5% for lys, 29.4% for met plus cys, 40.0% for thr), 39 900 kcal kg –1 for AME, 666% for Ca, and 333% for available P. A negative control diet was based on the modified formulation but did not include phytase. Differences between diets were observed for tibia ash, and Ca and P in the ash, as well as for BW and measures of egg quality. Egg production likely provided the best measure of the adequacy of P nutrition. In the final period of production, feed intake and egg production of hens fed the nutrient-reduced corn-based diet without enzyme was lower (P < 0.05) than that of hens on the control diet. Egg production of hens fed the nutrient-reduced diet with phytase was similar to that of hens fed the control diet, showing that inclusion of phytase permits formulation of corn-based diets with reduced levels of energy, CP, Ca, and P. No major effect of diet was seen for the hens fed wheat-based diets indicating that the formulation changes used may not have been appropriate for evaluating a response to exogenous phytase in wheat-based diets. Key words: Phytase, layers, corn, wheat, phosphorus
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".