MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Saving Diabetic Limbs in Canada: Partnership Between the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Association of Wound Care

2012· editorial· en· W2025331746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariam Botros, M. Gail Woodbury, Janet L. Kuhnke, Marc Despatis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Wound Journal · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesPopulationPublic healthObesityEnvironmental healthGerontologyDiseaseHealth careInternal medicineNursingEndocrinologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is a complex multi-system disease (1). The World Health Organization projects diabetes to increase from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030 with most increases occurring in Third-World countries and Aboriginal populations (2). In Canada, in 2008/2009, 200 000 new cases of diabetes were diagnosed; 47.5% of these individuals were obese (3). The correlation of diabetes to obesity is significant, and there is a direct relationship between dietary and lifestyle choices, food intake and activity levels with rates of diabetes (3,4). With these increasing rates we need to be prepared to support persons with diabetes with prevention strategies and self-management support. In Canada, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes rates are dramatically increasing in direct proportion to obesity rates and the aging population (3). In 2003, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences reported that 2 million Canadians have diabetes with a yearly estimated cost of $9 billion annually (5). The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) (3) reports an even higher rate of diabetes at 2.4 million of the 34 million Canadians (6). Diabetes affects most organs and circulatory systems, yet, the majority of Type 2 diabetes is preventable. Persons with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes are at risk of developing long-term foot complications, ulcers and amputations. Complications of diabetes cost the Canadian health care system millions of dollars each year and persons living with diabetes use health care services 2.4 times more than the general population (7). Complications of diabetes include: blindness, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular disease and heart attack, and neuropathy. Vascular complications lead to superficial and deep infections, non healing ulcerations of the feet, and amputation(s) of the lower or upper limb (1,8). With each new case of diabetes we have an increase in complication rates, ulcerations, infections and amputations. There is growing recognition that all aspects of diabetes prevention and management, including foot complications, need to be taken into consideration, not only biological factors, but also the psychological and social components. These complex factors must be considered when working with patients and their families. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is aware of the growing need for agencies to adopt and utilise the Chronic Care Disease Model in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care delivery services and programmes to all persons living with chronic diseases including diabetes. The Chronic Care Disease Model (CCDM) has been ‘proposed as a multitasked, interdependent framework to improve health care delivery’ through the interplay between the healthcare system and the community (10) (Figure 1). One of the core elements of this model is self-management support, with the goal of empowering patients, families and communities to become involved, informed and active in their care. The PHAC, under the Canadian Diabetes Strategy, is working in partnership with Canadian Association of Wound Care (CAWC) to develop self-management interactive educational tools (Phase 1), and a Peer-Led educational programme to encourage self-management and to empower persons with diabetes to adopt healthy, daily, foot care practices (Phase 2). The chronic care model. In 2010 CAWC in partnership with the Public Health Agency of Canada launched the Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You educational and interactive programme and website for persons living with diabetes. The diabetes educational tools can be found online at: http://www.cawc.net/diabetesandhealthyfeet. Brochures for persons with diabetes have been translated into as many as 16 languages. The Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You initiative has been extended into Phase 2. This phase includes implementation of a Peer Leader educational programme that empowers persons living with diabetes to know and apply good foot care practices. The Peer Leader Education Program (PEP) workshops are called PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You. The goal of the Peer-Led workshops is to develop a network of community peer educators and motivate persons with diabetes to change how they care for their feet and potentially prevent foot ulcers. Peer Leaders from each province will facilitate workshops in partnership and with the support of health care professionals. The focus of the programme is to empower persons living with diabetes to ‘discover and use their own innate abilities to gain mastery of their diabetes' and foot care (11). Peer-led, self-management programmes have been identified as having significant benefits to people with diabetes (12). The success of peer-led programmes is attributed to having support from a person who has experienced the challenges of living with a similar condition, in this case diabetes and its complications. Persons living with diabetes and neuropathy have been identified as the best candidates to facilitate the PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You workshop (13). The CAWC educational programme team has used this knowledge to build PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You programme to be led by volunteer Peer Leaders who live with diabetes and neuropathy; they co-lead the workshops with volunteer healthcare professionals committed to improving the lives of persons with diabetes. The PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You programme was developed to incorporate multiple educational strategies including presentations, cognitive strategies, behavioral activities and social interventions that include goal setting, problem solving, group activities and other motivational strategies (1). The CAWC will continue to work with the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian healthcare professionals and persons with diabetes to evaluate the effectiveness of these workshops and increase awareness and knowledge about foot health and foot care with an ultimate goal of reducing the number of preventable foot ulcers and related limb amputations in persons with diabetes. For more information about the upcoming PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You– PEP Talk Peer Education Program workshops in your community, please contact Andrea Martin at [email protected]. Mariam Botros, M. Gail Woodbury, Janet Kuhnke and Marc Despatis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Wound JournalSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207