Saving Diabetic Limbs in Canada: Partnership Between the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Association of Wound Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetes is a complex multi-system disease (1). The World Health Organization projects diabetes to increase from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030 with most increases occurring in Third-World countries and Aboriginal populations (2). In Canada, in 2008/2009, 200 000 new cases of diabetes were diagnosed; 47.5% of these individuals were obese (3). The correlation of diabetes to obesity is significant, and there is a direct relationship between dietary and lifestyle choices, food intake and activity levels with rates of diabetes (3,4). With these increasing rates we need to be prepared to support persons with diabetes with prevention strategies and self-management support. In Canada, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes rates are dramatically increasing in direct proportion to obesity rates and the aging population (3). In 2003, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences reported that 2 million Canadians have diabetes with a yearly estimated cost of $9 billion annually (5). The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) (3) reports an even higher rate of diabetes at 2.4 million of the 34 million Canadians (6). Diabetes affects most organs and circulatory systems, yet, the majority of Type 2 diabetes is preventable. Persons with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes are at risk of developing long-term foot complications, ulcers and amputations. Complications of diabetes cost the Canadian health care system millions of dollars each year and persons living with diabetes use health care services 2.4 times more than the general population (7). Complications of diabetes include: blindness, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular disease and heart attack, and neuropathy. Vascular complications lead to superficial and deep infections, non healing ulcerations of the feet, and amputation(s) of the lower or upper limb (1,8). With each new case of diabetes we have an increase in complication rates, ulcerations, infections and amputations. There is growing recognition that all aspects of diabetes prevention and management, including foot complications, need to be taken into consideration, not only biological factors, but also the psychological and social components. These complex factors must be considered when working with patients and their families. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is aware of the growing need for agencies to adopt and utilise the Chronic Care Disease Model in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care delivery services and programmes to all persons living with chronic diseases including diabetes. The Chronic Care Disease Model (CCDM) has been ‘proposed as a multitasked, interdependent framework to improve health care delivery’ through the interplay between the healthcare system and the community (10) (Figure 1). One of the core elements of this model is self-management support, with the goal of empowering patients, families and communities to become involved, informed and active in their care. The PHAC, under the Canadian Diabetes Strategy, is working in partnership with Canadian Association of Wound Care (CAWC) to develop self-management interactive educational tools (Phase 1), and a Peer-Led educational programme to encourage self-management and to empower persons with diabetes to adopt healthy, daily, foot care practices (Phase 2). The chronic care model. In 2010 CAWC in partnership with the Public Health Agency of Canada launched the Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You educational and interactive programme and website for persons living with diabetes. The diabetes educational tools can be found online at: http://www.cawc.net/diabetesandhealthyfeet. Brochures for persons with diabetes have been translated into as many as 16 languages. The Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You initiative has been extended into Phase 2. This phase includes implementation of a Peer Leader educational programme that empowers persons living with diabetes to know and apply good foot care practices. The Peer Leader Education Program (PEP) workshops are called PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You. The goal of the Peer-Led workshops is to develop a network of community peer educators and motivate persons with diabetes to change how they care for their feet and potentially prevent foot ulcers. Peer Leaders from each province will facilitate workshops in partnership and with the support of health care professionals. The focus of the programme is to empower persons living with diabetes to ‘discover and use their own innate abilities to gain mastery of their diabetes' and foot care (11). Peer-led, self-management programmes have been identified as having significant benefits to people with diabetes (12). The success of peer-led programmes is attributed to having support from a person who has experienced the challenges of living with a similar condition, in this case diabetes and its complications. Persons living with diabetes and neuropathy have been identified as the best candidates to facilitate the PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You workshop (13). The CAWC educational programme team has used this knowledge to build PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You programme to be led by volunteer Peer Leaders who live with diabetes and neuropathy; they co-lead the workshops with volunteer healthcare professionals committed to improving the lives of persons with diabetes. The PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You programme was developed to incorporate multiple educational strategies including presentations, cognitive strategies, behavioral activities and social interventions that include goal setting, problem solving, group activities and other motivational strategies (1). The CAWC will continue to work with the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian healthcare professionals and persons with diabetes to evaluate the effectiveness of these workshops and increase awareness and knowledge about foot health and foot care with an ultimate goal of reducing the number of preventable foot ulcers and related limb amputations in persons with diabetes. For more information about the upcoming PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You– PEP Talk Peer Education Program workshops in your community, please contact Andrea Martin at [email protected]. Mariam Botros, M. Gail Woodbury, Janet Kuhnke and Marc Despatis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".