MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025333717 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.242503

Measurement of the Cascade Transition via the First Excited State of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>in the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Reaction, and Its<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math>Factor in Stellar Helium Burning

2006· article· lv· W2025333717 on OpenAlexaff
C. Matei, L. Buchmann, Wolf-Rüdiger Hannes, D.A. Hutcheon, Camilo Ruíz, C. R. Brune, J. A. Caggiano, A. A. Chen, J.M. D’Auria, A. M. Laird, M Lamey, ZH. Li, Weizhi Liu, Å. Olin, D. Ottewell, J. Pearson, G. Ruprecht, M. Trinczek, Christof Vockenhuber, C. Wrede

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster UniversityTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsRecoilEnergy (signal processing)Radiative transferNuclear reactionNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiative $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-particle capture into the first excited, ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={0}^{+}$ state of $^{16}\mathrm{O}$ at 6.049 MeV excitation energy has rarely been discussed as contributing to the $^{12}\mathrm{C}(\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction cross section due to experimental difficulties in observing this transition. We report here measurements of this radiative capture in $^{12}\mathrm{C}(\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{16}\mathrm{O}$ for center-of-mass energies of $E=2.22\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ to 5.42 MeV at the DRAGON recoil separator. To determine cross sections, the acceptance of the recoil separator has been simulated in GEANT as well as measured directly. The transition strength between resonances has been identified in $R$-matrix fits as resulting both from $E2$ contributions as well as $E1$ radiative capture. Details of the extrapolation of the total cross section to low energies are then discussed [${S}_{6.0}(300)={25}_{\ensuremath{-}15}^{+16}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}\text{ }\mathrm{b}$] showing that this transition is likely the most important cascade contribution for $^{12}\mathrm{C}(\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{16}\mathrm{O}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0100.009
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207