MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025402086 · doi:10.1149/1.2190030

A Method to Measure the Proton Conductivity of LiNaSO[sub 4] under Fuel Cell Conditions

2006· article· en· W2025402086 on OpenAlexafffund
Feng Yu, Jing‐Li Luo, K. T. Chuang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsConductivityElectrolyteIonic conductivityHydrogenProtonProton conductorIonic bondingMaterials scienceElectrical conductorIonProton transportAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fast ion conductorInorganic chemistryChemistryChemical engineeringElectrodeComposite materialChromatographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method has been developed for measurement of proton conductivity of hydrogen-reducible ionic conductors under protonic fuel cell conditions in which the reducible electrolyte is sandwiched between layers of a nonreducible proton-conducting electrolyte in a disk. The proton conductivity of under the fuel-cell condition was determined with Y-doped (BCY) as the nonreducible sandwich layers, using conventional methods under hydrogen at high temperature, under which conditions would otherwise be chemically unstable. and BCY had good chemical and mechanical compatibility in the sandwich disk. The major portion of the ionic conductivity of at is due to and ion transport, and proton conductivity ( at to at ) accounts for only 5–10% of total ion conductivity ( at to at ). These data explain the poor performance of hydrocarbon conversion fuel cells using as the electrolyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207