MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025405562 · doi:10.1109/iccchina.2013.6671202

Explicit rate based transmission control in vehicle to infrastructure communications

2013· article· en· W2025405562 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanguo Bi, Xuemin Shen, Hai Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkBottleneckBuffer overflowQuality of serviceChannel (broadcasting)Network packetPacket lossNetwork congestionTransport layerTransmission (telecommunications)Layer (electronics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle to infrastructure communications can provide mobile users with a series of Internet services, such as video streaming, digital map downloading, database access, online gaming, and even safety services like accident alarm, traffic condition broadcast, etc., through fixed roadside units. However, the dynamics of communication environment and frequent changing topology critically challenge the design of an efficient transport layer protocol, which makes it difficult to guarantee diverse quality of service (QoS) requirements for various applications. In this paper, we present a novel transport scheme in infrastructure based vehicular networks, and aim to resolve some challenging issues such as source transfer rate adjustment, congestion avoidance, and fairness in end to end data communications. By precisely detecting packet losses and identifying various causes of these losses (for example, link disconnection, channel error, packet collision, buffer overflow), the proposed scheme adopts different reacting mechanisms to each of the losses. Moreover, it timely monitors the buffer size of the bottleneck RSU, and dynamically makes transfer rate feedbacks to the source nodes to avoids buffer overflow or vacancy. Finally, simulation results show that the scheme not only successfully reduces packet losses due to buffer overflow and link disconnection but also improves the utilization efficiency of channel resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207