MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025407308 · doi:10.1139/z04-096

Overwintering in the nest by hatchling map turtles (<i>Graptemys geographica</i>)

2004· article· en· W2025407308 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roy D. Nagle, Clayton L. Lutz, Andrew L Pyle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Army Corps of EngineersPennsylvania Department of Transportation
KeywordsHatchlingOverwinteringNest (protein structural motif)BiologyEcologyIncubationZoologyHatching

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We monitored 75 natural nests of Graptemys geographica (Lesueur, 1817) in central Pennsylvania to determine the tactics and patterns of hatchling emergence. Following incubation, all hatchlings in 95% of nests delayed emergence from their natal nest cavities throughout autumn and winter until the following spring. Nests were constructed in a variety of substrates ranging from loose sand or coal to hard-packed clay mixed with gravel. Time from egg deposition to natural hatchling emergence averaged 333 days. During winter, hatchlings tolerated subzero temperatures as low as –8 °C, which are lethal to hatchlings of some sympatric species. Emergence occurred from 10 April to 25 May, and most hatchlings were found during morning following rain. There was an interactive effect of minimum daily air temperature and rainfall level 1 day prior to emergence on the number of hatchlings emerging each day. One half of all hatchlings found dead were contained in nests in which autumn emergence had apparently occurred. We speculate that autumn emergence by hatchlings of some turtle species may be an adaptive response to nest conditions likely to provide poor environments for successful overwintering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207