Striatal Afferents in the Newt Triturus cristatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to investigate the neuronal populations projecting to the corpus striatum in the brain of a urodele, Triturus cristatus, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) retrograde labeling was used in parallel with anterograde degeneration, glyoxylic acid histofluorescence and behavioral testing. Striatal injections of HRP revealed that the main striatal afferent systems originate within the diencephalon, specifically in the dorsal thalamus and paraventricular organ of the hypothalamus. Several small groups of neurons in other diencephalic areas also participate in striatal innervation: proeminentia ventralis, amygdala, contralateral corpus striatum, preoptic area, posterior tuberal nucleus, locus coeruleus and raphe nuclei. Degeneration experiments after mechanical lesion of the paraventricular organ established the existence of a hypothalamostriatal projection. Degenerating axonal profiles were also found in many of the structures already identified as projecting to the striatum, suggesting that the paraventricular organ might influence the striatum not only directly but also indirectly through these other afferent systems. In the paraventricular organ, glyoxylic acid fluorescence histochemistry showed numerous monoamine neurons that corresponded in distribution and morphology to the retrogradely HRP-labeled neurons. Paraventricular-organ-lesioned males displayed a severe impairment of courtship behavior in the form of decreased tail beating and head stepping by the females. This suggests that the regulation of stereotyped hypermotricity might involve the monoamine component of the hypothalamo-striatal projection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".