MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025455507 · doi:10.5539/res.v5n4p172

Time to Abolish the Duchy of Lancaster

2013· article· en· W2025455507 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Graham McBain

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuchyEstateLawHonourSovereigntyCLARITYCrown (dentistry)Political scienceHistoryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The duchy of Lancaster is one of two duchies left in England – the other being the duchy of Cornwall. Lancaster was likely an honour prior to 1066; it became a county palatine in 1267 and a duchy in 1351. As such, it has been held by the sovereign separate to the Crown – a legal estate which passes from one sovereign to another as a form of inheritance. The purpose of this article is to consider the legal status of the duchy in modern times. Also, the various Crown prerogatives which have been franchised to it as well as other privileges it has acquired over the centuries. This article concludes that the duchy should be abolished and its property transferred to the Crown Estate, since it no longer has any true legal purpose.This would not only be to the benefit of the sovereign, it would ensure easier administration, greater financial clarity and the abolition of obsolete laws,courts and sinecures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207