MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025456696 · doi:10.2118/02-12-tn

Chemostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz in Southern Alberta

2002· article· en· W2025456696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K.T. Radcliffe, A. M. Wright, Brian A. Zaitlin, David Wray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyChemostratigraphyFaciesCretaceousFluvialPaleontologyUnconformityPetrographyStratigraphySedimentary rockGeochemistryStructural basinIsotopes of carbonTectonicsTotal organic carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz (BQ) of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) is the basal part of the Lower Mannville Formation, which, together with the overlying Upper Mannville, is considered one of the most prolific hydrocarbon- bearing successions in the WCSB. However, due to the reservoir complexity often associated with low accommodation fluvial settings, detailed stratigraphic studies are required to fully exploit the potential. Preliminary findings of this chemostratigraphic study on the Horsefly, BAT, and Ellerslie units show that considerable and systematic elemental variation exists between the claystones of the three units. These variations allow the stratigraphic affinity of a claystone core sample to be determined using chemostratigraphy, thereby demonstrating that the technique is a viable additional stratigraphic tool in the WCSB, and more generally, in low accommodation fluvial settings. Introduction The Lower Cretaceous Basal Quartz (BQ) is an informal term for the Lower Mannville succession, which together with the "Ostracode," forms the Lower Mannville Formation (see Figure 1). In the study area of southern Alberta, the BQ is thin (<100 m), and is characterized by a complex stratigraphy punctuated by multiple unconformities(1, 2) (Figure 2). Based upon detailed stratigraphic and petrographic differentiation, the BQ is divisible into seven mappable units (Regional A, Mesa IV, Valley and Terrace, Horsefly, BAT, and Ellerslie). This chemostratigraphic study has concentrated on the fine grained facies of the Horsefly, BAT and Ellerslie units, which form the upper of two cycles within the Lower Mannville Formation (see Figure 1). The technique of chemostratigraphy is used to differentiate between the finer grained sediments of the Horsefly, BAT, and Ellerslie units based on variations in their major and trace element compositions. By the selection of cored intervals in wells whose stratigraphy had already been determined by detailed petrographicstudies(1), it is shown that the associated finer grained facies of the Horsefly, BAT, and Ellerslie units exhibit significantly different elemental compositions. Chemostratigraphy, or chemical stratigraphy, involves the characterization and correlation of strata using major and trace element geochemistry. For this study, data for a total of 47 elements (ten major elements, 23 trace elements, and 14 rare earth elements) have been determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emissions spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The sample preparation and analytical procedures are detailed in Pearce et al.(3) and Jarvis and Jarvis(4). Conventional cores from six wells (Table 1) were sampled for the study. The intervals sampled have already been stratigraphically assigned [Zaitlin et al.,(1) Table 1]; when sampling the core, apparently homogenous silty claystone chips with volumes of approximately 2 - 3 cm3 were selected for analysis. Results and Discussion Geochemical Differentiation The principal aim of this paper is to demonstrate that significant geochemical variations exist between the silty claystones of the Horsefly, BAT, and Ellerslie units. The most effective way to demonstrate any such variation is in the form of geochemical profiles, binary and ternary diagrams (see Figures 3, 4, and 5). Geochemical Profiles Geochemical profiles for a single section are constructed by plotting element concentrations, or element ratios, against depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207