MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025457303 · doi:10.1021/ic301311m

Ternary Arsenides A<sub>2</sub>Zn<sub>5</sub>As<sub>4</sub> (A = K, Rb): Zintl Phases Built from <i>Stellae Quadrangulae</i>

2012· article· en· W2025457303 on OpenAlexaff
Stanislav S. Stoyko, Mansura Khatun, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTernary operationTetrahedronAlkali metalCrystallographyStoichiometryStructure typeGroup (periodic table)Space groupCrystal structureBand gapX-ray crystallographyInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryCondensed matter physicsDiffractionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stoichiometric reaction of the elements at high temperature yields the ternary arsenides K(2)Zn(5)As(4) (650 °C) and Rb(2)Zn(5)As(4) (600 °C). They adopt a new structure type (Pearson symbol oC44, space group Cmcm, Z = 4; a = 11.5758(5) Å, b = 7.0476(3) Å, c = 11.6352(5) Å for K(2)Zn(5)As(4); a = 11.6649(5) Å, b = 7.0953(3) Å, c = 11.7585(5) Å for Rb(2)Zn(5)As(4)) with a complex three-dimensional framework of linked ZnAs(4) tetrahedra generating large channels that are occupied by the alkali-metal cations. An alternative and useful way of describing the structure is through the use of stellae quadrangulae each consisting of four ZnAs(4) tetrahedra capping an empty central tetrahedron. These compounds are Zintl phases; band structure calculations on K(2)Zn(5)As(4) and Rb(2)Zn(5)As(4) indicate semiconducting behavior with a direct band gap of 0.4 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207