Recycling of DLC-Coated Tools for Dry Machining of Aluminum Alloys via Oxygen Plasma Ashing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DLC coated tools have been widely utilized in the dry milling and cutting of aluminum alloy parts and components for automotive industries and cellular phone makers. Most of these tools are inevitably exchanged with new ones to preserve high quality of machined products. Then, the used DLC coating must be removed or ashed away before grinding and polishing. Complete removal of used DLC coating plays a key to make DLC-recoating onto the ashed surface of tools for their reuse. High density oxygen plasma ashing provides a solution to make perfect ashing of DLC coating together with metallic interlayers before recoating. In the present paper, this plasma system with quantitative diagnosis instrumentation is first stated to describe the effect of processing conditions on the ashing behavior. Two types of end-milling tools were prepared to prove that the whole DLC-coating should be completely removed with fast rate. This ashed tool substrate was ground and DLC-recoated to demonstrate that the reused tools have the same machinability in dry as the original virgin tools through dry milling experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it