MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025483233 · doi:10.1002/pen.21968

Orientation, mechanical, and optical properties of poly (lactic acid) nanoclay composite films

2011· article· en· W2025483233 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed H. Tabatabaei, Abdellah Ajji

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocompositeComposite materialExfoliation jointIntercalation (chemistry)Composite numberMontmorillonitePolymerModulusLayer (electronics)GrapheneNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, the orientation, mechanical as well as the optical properties of multilayer films of nanoclay filled poly (lactic acid) (PLA) as the core layer and polyethylene (PE) as the skin layer obtained from the film blowing process were investigated. The effect of nanoclay content in the range of 1–7.5 wt% was considered. The orientation of the polymers crystal unit cells, alignment of clay platelets as well as the extent of intercalation and exfoliation were studied using wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). The measurement of d ‐spacing of the 001 plane (normal to platelets plane) of the clay tactoids indicated intercalation of the silicate layers in the PLA nanocomposite multilayer films. The Young modulus and tear resistance along the machine and transverse directions (MD and TD, respectively) improved significantly with the presence of the nanoparticles and percentage of nanofiller studied. The haze of the nanocomposite films decreased with clay concentration up to 5 wt% and increased by further addition of the nanoclay. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207