MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025486445 · doi:10.1080/03009740500537945

Progress and regression within primary Sjögren's syndrome

2006· review· en· W2025486445 on OpenAlex
R. Manthorpe, Anders Bredberg, Gunnel Henriksson, Anne Larsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsDown Syndrome Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyRheumatoid arthritisTerminologyLymphomaDermatologyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this review is to give a modern view and an update of important areas in primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), which may be the most common of the autoimmune systemic rheumatic diseases. Interest in aspects of primary SS including clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, aetiology, treatment, prognosis, etc has increased during the past three decades, the volume of scientific papers and the number of theses being the indicators. However, only a fraction of the money that is used for research into rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is used for SS, and the statement that SS is under-diagnosed, under-treated and under-researched will still be valid for several years to come. The topics that are focused on in this review are: (a) clinical areas with subsections on signs and symptoms, terminology, predictors for development of non-Hodgkin malignant lymphoma (NHML) and prognosis, (b) treatment, (c) the Danger model (aetiopathogenesis) and (d) pathology, including immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-positive cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it