MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025492463 · doi:10.1134/s0036029509030136

The study of liquidus and solidus surfaces of the four-component system Fe-Ni-Cu-S. Part 1. Graphing of meltability in the three-component system Fe-Ni-Cu

2009· article· en· W2025492463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Metallurgy (Metally) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Science and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidusLiquidusComponent (thermodynamics)MetallurgyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is the first part of the cycle of studies, devoted to phase transformations in the four-component system Fe-Ni-Cu-S. The studies were conducted with the application of thermal analysis and scanning electron microscopy methods. In the result of the work liquidus and solidus surfaces of the system Fe-Ni-Cu were constructed with plotted isotherms in the range 1100–1500°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it