MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025536298 · doi:10.1002/marc.200900551

Small, Stable, and Monodispersed Bubbles Encapsulated with Biopolymers

2009· article· en· W2025536298 on OpenAlex
Jai Il Park, Ethan Tumarkin, Eugenia Kumacheva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysozymeDissolutionAqueous solutionChemical engineeringSolubilityDeposition (geology)ChemistryPolysaccharideMicrofluidicsShrinkageBubbleMaterials scienceChromatographyNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microfluidic route to producing small (<10 µm) bubbles with a narrow size distribution and long-time (at least, up to one month) stability is reported. The bubbles are encapsulated with a protein-polysaccharide shell. The strategy includes the following events, occurring in sequence: (i) a microfluidic generation of bubbles from a mixture of CO(2) and a minute amount of gases with low solubility in water, in an aqueous solution of lysozyme and sodium alginate; (ii) the dissolution of CO(2) leading to the shrinkage of bubbles and a local increase in acidity of the medium; (iii) the deposition of lysozyme at the gas-water interface triggered by the local decrease in pH; (iv) the deposition of alginate onto the lysozyme shell, due to the electrostatically driven complexation of alginate with lysozyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it