Site-directed Mutagenesis of the Active Site Region in the Quinate/Shikimate 5-Dehydrogenase YdiB of Escherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
YdiB and its paralog AroE are members of the quinate/shikimate 5-dehdrogenase family. Enzymes from this family function in the shikimate pathway that is essential for survival of microorganisms and plants and represent potential drug targets. Recent YdiB and AroE crystal structures revealed the presence of a NAD(P)-binding and a catalytic domain. We carried out site-directed mutagenesis of 8 putative active site residues in YdiB from Escherichia coli and analyzed structural and kinetic properties of the mutant enzymes. Our data indicate critical roles for an invariant lysine and aspartate residue in substrate binding and allowed us to differentiate between two previously proposed models for the binding of the substrate in the active site. Comparison of several YdiB and AroE structures led us to conclude that, upon cofactor binding and domain closure, the 2 identified binding residues are repositioned to bind to the substrate. Although the lysine residue contributes to some extent to the stabilization of the transition state, we did not identify any residue as catalytically essential. This indicates that catalysis does not operate through a general acid-base mechanism, as thought originally. Our improved understanding of the medically and agriculturally important quinate/shikimate 5-dehydrogenase family at the molecular level may prove useful in the development of novel herbicides and antimicrobial agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".