MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Les déterminants de la fidélité des clients commerciaux dans l'industrie bancaire canadienne

2003· article· fr· W2025585329 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jasmin Bergeron, Line Ricard, Jean Perrien

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcurrenceLoyaltyBusiness administrationPolitical scienceBusinessHumanitiesFinancial institutionCompetition (biology)FinanceMarketingPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La concurrence omniprésente qui sévit dans l'industrie bancaire canadienne motive les institutions financières à développer des stratégies pour fidéliser leurs clients. La présente étude empirique montre que la fidélité des clients commerciaux dépend notamment de la confiance de l'entreprise envers son institution financière, de la culture relationnelle instaurée par la banque, de l'absence de conflits entre les deux parties, et du niveau concurrentiel de l'organisation. Plusieurs recommandations stratégiques et opportunités de recherche sont présentées. Abstract The omnipresent competition that exists in the banking industry motivates financial institutions to increase customer loyalty. This empirical study indicates that the loyalty of commercial clients toward their bank depends mostly on the following factors: the company's trust toward its financial institution, the relational culture implemented in the bank, the occurrence of conflicts between both parties, and the competitiveness of the organization. Strategic recommendations and research opportunities are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l AdministrationSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207