MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Estimating the Time to Reach a Target Frequency in Singing

2009· article· en· W2025591910 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Hutchins, David A. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingingSpeech recognitionLatency (audio)Computer scienceTonalityTime–frequency analysisAcousticsTelecommunicationsRadarPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to match pitches quickly and accurately is essential for proficient singing. We describe a new technique for estimating the time to reach a target frequency that uses adaptive optimal-kernel (AOK) time-frequency representations, designed to optimize the time-frequency tradeoff at each time point. We show in two experiments that this measure is more sensitive to tonal priming effects than an onset latency measurement. This analysis is applied to the vocal productions of untrained singers to reveal effects of tonality and pitch height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207