The Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT) prospective five year study of Canadian children hospitalized for chickenpox or an associated complication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccine was approved for use in Canada in 1998. A major goal of universal varicella vaccine programs is to reduce severe infection and associated complications. Baseline data are essential against which to judge the effectiveness of routine childhood immunization. OBJECTIVE: To describe morbidity and mortality among children hospitalized for chickenpox. Methods. From January 1, 1991, to March 31, 1996, chickenpox admissions to 11 pediatric referral centers were actively identified. Patient and illness characteristics were compared for 3 subgroups defined by prior health: healthy; unhealthy but immunocompetent; immunocompromised. RESULTS: Of 861 cases 488 (56.7%) were healthy, 75(8.7%) were unhealthy and 298 (34.6%) were immunocompromised. The immunocompromised children differed from healthy/unhealthy cases in mean age (6.4 vs. 4.0/4.6 years, respectively, P < 0.0001); median interval from rash onset to admission (2 vs. 5/5 days, P < 0.0001); complication rate (20% vs. 90%/79%; P = 0.001); and rate of acyclovir therapy (98% vs. 24%/39%; P = 0.001). Unhealthy vs. healthy cases had a higher frequency (P < 0.01) of intensive care (13.3% vs. 4.7%), ventilation (9.3% vs. 2.0%) and death (4% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSION: These data provide a baseline for morbidity/mortality resulting from chickenpox before varicella vaccine use in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".