MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025651495 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0009

A War of Patrols: Canadian Army Operations in Korea (review)

2004· article· en· W2025651495 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Howard G. Coombs

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarInfantryLawWorld War IIHistoryMilitary historyOperational level of warMediocrity principlePolitical scienceOperations researchManagementEngineeringRed Army's tactics in World War II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A War of Patrols: Canadian Army Operations in Korea Howard G. Coombs (bio) William Johnston. A War of Patrols: Canadian Army Operations in Korea University of British Columbia Press. xx, 426. $45.00 In the last two years a number of publications examining the Canadian experience of the Korean conflict have become available. These books, although unlike in format and style, are similar in that they are able to draw upon a large number of sources to examine dispassionately the events of fifty years ago. In conjunction with official histories they form a comprehensive modern dialogue on Canadian Army involvement in the Korean War. This discourse addresses what were formerly silences in the [End Page 501] body of historical material concerned with the Canadian Army throughout that conflict. Of particular note in this dialogue is William Johnston's A War of Patrols: Canadian Army Operations in Korea. This book provides a highly acclaimed revisionist counterpoint to commonly accepted unfavourable perceptions of the performance of the hastily formed all-volunteer Special Force. He demonstrates, quite to the contrary, that succeeding rotations of professional regular army units failed to continue the successful methods of these initial volunteers. This resulted in allied complaints concerning the mediocrity of Canadian military performance, which until now have been attributed to supposed deficiencies of the Special Force. Johnston has created a seminal work that provokes a thoughtful re-examination of the training, leadership, operations, and tactics demonstrated in the course of Canadian Army operations during the Korean War. Johnston shows that between 1950 and 1953 there were essentially three separate campaigns conducted by the Canadian 25 Brigade. A War of Patrols reveals that for the period of the initial deployment the Special Force, consisting for the most part of Second World War veterans, had an active, aggressive approach to operations in Korea. He opines that subsequent rotations consisting of serving regular troops did not mirror this attitude, with a corresponding negative impact on the tactical performance of 25 Brigade from late 1951 onwards. Throughout that period the defensive conflict, conducted by the Canadians, degenerated from the aggressive 'war of patrols' waged by the Special Force to passivity, with attempts by the last rotation to regain supremacy on the battlefield. In effect, each set of units fought a different and distinct war, with varying results. A War of Patrols provides valuable insight to the Canadian military experience. Johnston's methodical, detailed scrutiny of primary and secondary sources provides fresh perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of the Canadian Army in Korea. Additionally, Johnston illustrates a reccurring truth of national policy through the last half-century: 'Canada's involvement in the Korean War was simply the nation's contribution to an international standoff that one only read about in the newspaper.' Because the vital interests of the country were not at risk, as in other instances of Canadian military commitment since that time, the armed forces of Canada sustained themselves by voluntary recruitment and consequently made a limited impression on the nation as a whole. Without the participation of Canadian society the level of public concern regarding the events in Korea was low, with a corresponding effect on the Canadian Army. This lack of curiosity was mirrored in the actions or lack thereof during the passive defence of 1952 and 1953 and was in direct contrast to other Commonwealth units. Johnston provides a complete and contextual account of the manner in which the Canadian Army, albeit unknowingly, conducted three successive individual operations during the Korean War and dispels the commonly held perception of a single and cohesive three- year [End Page 502] war. Moreover, he dismisses the myth of amateurism associated with the quickly formed Special Force and prompts a reconsideration of the military qualities of the then existent professional army. A War of Patrols is a definitive work that provides not only a perspective of the relationship of the state and the military but also provokes introspection concerning the role and meaning of regular military forces within the Canadian context. In the final analysis, William Johnston has created a masterful and unique historical account that provides a splendid contribution to the current body of scholarship pertaining...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207