MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025664259 · doi:10.3109/13697137.2011.636847

Hot flushes, vascular reactivity and the role of the α-adrenergic system

2012· article· en· W2025664259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClimacteric · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClonidineAgonistPlaceboVasodilationSodium nitroprussideAdrenergic agonistAdrenergicInternal medicinePerfusionIontophoresisEndocrinologyLaser Doppler velocimetryMicrocirculationAnesthesiaBlood flowReceptorNitric oxidePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Seventy percent of postmenopausal women suffer from hot flushes but the pathophysiology is poorly understood. Proposed mechanisms include altered peripheral vascular reactivity and a narrowed thermoneutral zone. A trigger has not yet been identified; however, the α-adrenergic system, and specifically noradrenaline, has been implicated. Aim To assess the role of the α-adrenergic system by studying the effect of clonidine (α-adrenergic agonist) on flushes and cutaneous microvascular perfusion. Methods Thirty-two postmenopausal women with severe flushing and 14 non-flushing postmenopausal women were recruited. Cutaneous microvascular perfusion was measured using laser Doppler imaging and endothelial function was assessed by iontophoresis (administration of vasoactive agents through the skin by an electric current) of acetylcholine (ACh - endothelium-dependent) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP - endothelium-independent). In a double-blind, longitudinal, cross-over study, clonidine (an α-adrenergic agonist) was compared to placebo in its ability to modulate this response in the flushing group of women. Results The response of the subcutaneous vessels was greater in women who flushed than those who did not (ACh, p < 0.001 and SNP, p = 0.001). However, even though the intensity and number of flushes were decreased by clonidine, there was no difference compared to placebo (p = 0.21) and this 'placebo effect' was also noted in perfusion responses (ACh, p = 0.98; SNP, p = 0.50). Conclusion There was a significant 'placebo effect' for both clinical response and the reactivity of the subcutaneous vessels, making conclusions regarding the role of the α-adrenergic nervous system in hot flushing difficult to determine at a peripheral level. The mechanism for the change in vascular reactivity remains unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it