A Voice of Presence: Inuit Contributions toward the Public Provision of Health Care in Canada, 1900–1930
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face à la problématique de la souveraineté dans l'Arctique, l'État canadien s'est attaqué, souvent avec réticence, aux préoccupations des Inuits en matière de santé et de bien-être. Coincé entre la crainte de susciter la dépendance et celle d'être accusé de négliger ses responsabilités, le gouvernement canadien a, durant la période 1900–1930, tenté dans la confusion et l'incohérence de concilier les intérêts commerciaux – en particulier ceux de la Compagnie de la baie d'Hudson – et les préoccupations en matière de souveraineté et de bien-être des Inuits. La voix des Inuits – et les observations de cette prise de parole – ont fait ressortir la nécessité pour l'État d'intervenir et mis l'accent sur le rôle d'entreprises commerciales telles que la CBH et leur impact sur la santé publique. La « voix de la présence » – une contribution inuite à la politique de santé publique du Canada – ne devrait pas passer sous silence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".