MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025721189 · doi:10.2118/71323-ms

Direct Geostatistical Simulation With Multiscale Well, Seismic, and Production Data

2001· article· en· W2025721189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariogramKrigingCovarianceTransformation (genetics)Computer scienceHistogramData transformationGaussianReservoir simulationGeostatisticsAlgorithmData miningMathematicsStatisticsSpatial variabilityGeologyArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multiple realizations of facies, porosity, and permeability are used for better representation of reservoir heterogeneity for more accurate performance forecasting and uncertainty assessment. These geostatistical realizations must reproduce all available data to be reliable. The available well, seismic, and production data are at different scales and must be linked to the reservoir modeling scale. The most common geostatistical simulation algorithms call for a Gaussian or normal transformation. It is not possible to merge the data types after this non-linear transformation. This has led to development of "Direct" approaches for simulation and data integration. Considering the variables without transformation ensures reproduction of the different data and the prescribed covariance or variogram model; however, until now, the resulting global histogram of the simulated realizations is not reproduced. The problem is that there is no theory that specifies the shape of the conditional distributions. The mean and variance are determined from the well-known normal or simple kriging equations; however, theory has not existed to specify the shape of the conditional distributions. A number of ad-hoc solutions have been proposed, but they violate the data and artificially reduce the modeled space of uncertainty. This paper develops a theory for determination of the required distribution shapes and reproduction of the global histogram. The results have significant theoretical and practical consequences. Data from multiple sources and scales can be directly reproduced in reservoir models with no need for transformation. There is no need for ad-hoc post-processing transformation or correction schemes. Several applications with synthetic data are shown to illustrate the technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it